Category: Screenwriting

Screenwriting for Librarians: Part 4 – Library Video Tutorials (and what we can learn from cooking shows)

Posted by – September 10, 2011

The idea of this Screenwriting for Librarians series of blog posts is to share some screenwriting, storytelling and filmmaking techniques that I think might help fellow librarians who are interested in utilizing this medium to attract more users.

Librarians who are interested in making video tutorials should really check out cooking shows, which are possibly the most widely watched video tutorials today. Cooking shows are mainstream instructional videos designed to teach viewers how to do something. But they must also be entertaining and visually appealing, so that even those who don’t cook would watch them. We should try to impart these qualities to library video tutorials.

Research has shown that web viewers have extremely short attention spans. Most don’t watch web videos in their entirety. I know I tend to skip or fast forward most video tutorials, simply because most are too long, too slow or simply not engaging enough. With that in mind, note the pacing and the rhythm of the Gordon Ramsay video below.

In under 40 seconds, he teaches us how to make a very delicious looking Pasta with Crab, Chili, and Lime. It utilizes montage (a series of short shots edited into a sequence to condense space, time, and information) to move the video at a frantic pace, with each cut lasting only about 1/2 second. So, in a 40 secs video, there are probably close to 80 cuts. You can’t afford to look away. You have to pay attention. There are roughly 18 steps to make the dish. The voice-over directions are concise and simple. We don’t need complete sentences. That just slows things down. The key information here is, the tutorial doesn’t have to happen in real time. No cooking show would make the viewer wait in real time for the food to be done. The same should apply to good video tutorials – trim all the unnecessary footage. I would much rather have a video that goes fast and the student has to rewind to re-watch portions of it, than a video that’s too slow and students miss information because they skip or not pay attention.

Nigella Lawson’s video below takes a very different approach to teach us how to make a similar pasta dish.

The video is longer and has a more leisurely pace, yet it engages, perhaps even more so than the faster paced video. Note how she assures us at the beginning that “this is so easy”. As she gives out the directions, she explains the reason for every step. It is truly a cooking lesson. She gives her personal opinions and she uses emotional language which humanizes the whole process. The images are gorgeous to look at. And even though the cuts are longer than the Gordon Ramsay video’s, there are still at least 3-4 cuts for each step of the cooking, which keeps the viewers from getting bored visually.

We naturally like to look at food, but we may not be that interested in looking at screencasts of databases. How do we make our tutorials visually interesting? It requires some creativity. For example, in a demo of a database search, you could pick a subject matter that is visually interesting, such as sports (or food!). There are plenty of royalty free images/videos/sound effects/music that you can find to edit into the video. Intercutting a keyword search on, let’s say Michael Jordon, with an image or a video clip of Jordon in action, combined with appropriate sounds, could make for a more engaging viewing. The same technique could be used in practically any subject, as along as you are willing to search for some interesting supplemental images/video clips/sounds (or produce your own) to incorporate into your video tutorial.

Yes, it takes time and efforts to make a good video tutorial. But think about how many hours an effective one will save you if you won’t have to spend 10, 15, 20 mins demonstrating the same thing in class in real time over and over again.

Print Friendly

New Article on Writing Library Videos

Posted by – July 21, 2011

I am pleased to see that my article, “Design Your Library Video Like a Hollywood Blockbuster: Using Screenplay Structure to Engage Viewers“, which was written quite a while back, is finally published in the newest special issue of Indiana Libraries for Instructional Design and Technology. My colleagues, Jason Coleman, Danielle Theiss and Melia Erin Fritch also have an article on social software in this issue.

I have since written a few blog posts on the topic, but the journal article goes a bit more in depth by using a few more commercial films as examples. It also has an analysis of of this SPARKY Award winning short video:

Clueless Discovery from Aaron Ludwig on Vimeo.

 

Print Friendly

Screenwriting for Librarians: Part 3 – Story Structure

Posted by – February 15, 2011

At this critical time when the value of the library is often questioned, libraries and librarians must learn to better promote ourselves to our potential users. Using online promotional video is one good way to achieve that goal. The idea of this Screenwriting for Librarians series of blog posts is to share some screenwriting and storytelling techniques that I think might help fellow librarians who are interested in utilizing this medium to attract more users.

We all know a story has a beginning, middle and end. But what is in the beginning, the middle, or the end? When does the beginning become the middle, and how does the middle become the end? Sounds like silly questions, but knowing the answers means you know how to properly structure a story.

The beginning or Act I is the set up. It has to establish who the protagonist is, what he wants, and what is preventing him from getting it. Then comes an inciting event, which turns the protagonist’s world upside down and gives him a goal. This is where the real story begins. It is the question of whether the protagonist can achieve his goal that engages the audience. Towards the end of Act I, there should be a plot point that changes the direction of the story and makes the protagonist take drastic action to solve his problems. After which, the story moves into Act II. An example:

  • Raiders of the Lost Ark:
  • Setup – The opening action sequence of Indiana Jones trying to retrieve a golden idol in a South American jungle establishes him as an action hero, and then we find out that he is also an archeology professor.
  • Inciting event – Two government agents show up, and in their meeting Indy realizes that the Nazis are searching for the Lost Ark, which would make their army invincible. Our protagonist’s world is turned upside down, and his goal now is to stop the Nazis from acquiring the Lost Ark, and the real story begins.
  • The question – Can Indy stop the Nazis from acquiring the ark?
  • Plot Point I - Indy finds the headpiece of the Staff of Ra at his former lover Marion’s tavern. The Nazis attack the tavern and burn it down. Marion and Indy become partners on his continued quest. This changes the direction of the story and moves it into Act II.

The middle, or Act II is the confrontation. The protagonist actively tries to overcome his obstacles. Another plot point occurs towards the end of Act II that once again changes the direction of the story and moves it into Act III.

So, in Raiders of the Lost Ark, Indy and Marion confront the Nazis in Act II. And Plot Point II is the Nazis steal the Ark from Indy and kidnap Marion, which changes the direction of the story again and moves it into Act III.

The end, or Act III is the resolution. This is the answer to the question posed in Act I. So in Raiders of the Lost Ark, we find out whether Indy achieves his goal of stopping the Nazis from acquiring the ark here.

Google’s Parisian Love commercial is a good example of great storytelling. It’s simple, and it illustrates the story structure I just talked about perfectly. It shows that it really doesn’t cost a lot of money to tell a compelling story and to make a effective promo.

Act I

Set up – The protagonist studies abroad in Paris.

Inciting event – He meets a girl at a Parisian cafe, who tells him he’s très mignon. (His world is turned upside down, and the real story begins).

The Question – Will he and the girl be together?

Plot Point I – He has gone back home and he seeks “long distance relationship advice”. (This changes the direction of the story).

Act II

Confrontation – He takes action to try to overcome the obstacles to achieve his goal – to be with the girl. He looks for a job and flies to Paris.

Plot Point II – He looks for churches in Paris because he and the girl are getting married. (This again changes the direction of the story).

Act III

Resolution - A happy ending as he and his girl are going to have a baby. And it answers the question posed in Act I.

The message this commercial wants to convey is simply, “Search on”.

This is wonderfully good promotion, as it seduces and it uses the product to tell a story. (read more about good marketing vs bad marketing here).

Print Friendly

Screenwriting for Librarians: Part 2 – Elements of a good story

Posted by – February 9, 2011

At this critical time when the value of the library is often questioned, libraries and librarians must learn to better promote ourselves to our potential users. Using online promotional video is one good way to achieve that goal. The idea of this Screenwriting for Librarians series of blog posts is to share some screenwriting and storytelling techniques that I think might help fellow librarians who are interested in utilizing this medium to attract more users.

Drama is conflict. A dramatic story contains two essential elements: 1) a protagonist who wants something – a goal, and 2) obstacles that prevent the protagonist from achieving that goal. A typical story is always about someone wanting something but has to overcome obstacles to obtain it. The physical goal of the protagonist is the engine that drives the story forward.  But a story is not that interesting or “dramatic” if the protagonist can easily obtain what he or she wants. Therefore, obstacles to make life difficult for the protagonist (which creates conflicts) is essential.

We only have to look at some of the recent Hollywood movies and see that. For example:

  • in The King’s Speech, Henry VI has to overcome his stammer (obstacle) to become a worthy king (goal);
  • in Black Swan, to play the evil Black Swan (goal), Natalie Portman’s ballerina must fight against descending into madness (obstacle); or
  • in The Fighter, Micky Ward (Mark Wahlberg) wants to triumph in the ring (goal), but his domineering mother, crack addict brother, big haired sisters all make life difficult for him (obstacle).

The same principles apply to short videos. Because of the restriction of time, the goal of the protagonist must be clear very early on and the conflict must be simple and easy to see. An example:

As mentioned in my previous post, good commercials tend to focus on delivering just one simple message. This absurdly funny State Farm commercial only wants to convey this simple message: “Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there”. The protagonists’ goal here is to chill and enjoy their burger (just one! :) ). The obstacle is, well, the “raging” buffalo. And when their goal collides with the obstacle, we have conflict and drama.

And then the story is about them trying to overcome the the obstacle. First they sing the ridiculous State Farm Magic Jingle (which is now firmly lodged in my head. Just to show that this is a successful commercial) to summon the State Farm agent, who in turn comes up with the idea to use the jingle to transport them to his office to escape the attacking buffalo. Problem solved. End of story. Message conveyed.

This video also has a proper story structure: Act I (The Setup) is two dudes enjoying their burger and then getting attacked by a raging buffalo; Act II (The Confrontation) is them summoning the State Farm agent, and work together to confront the problem; and Act III (The Resolution) is where their agent solves the problem by transporting them back to the State Farm office.

Using a story is a good way to captivate viewers, but dramatizing a message is not an easy task, which is why we so often fall back to those dull “present the facts” videos. Hopefully the tips in this post will help you create a engaging story.

Print Friendly

Screenwriting for Librarians: Part 1 – What makes a good promo video?

Posted by – February 8, 2011

At this critical time when the value of the library is often questioned, libraries and librarians must learn to better promote ourselves to our potential users. Using online promotional video is one good way to achieve that goal. The idea of this Screenwriting for Librarians series of blog posts is to share some screenwriting and storytelling techniques that I think might help fellow librarians who are interested in utilizing this medium to attract more users.

Go to youtube and search for library promo and there are more than 2000 results. That number will no doubt increase as video technology becomes increasingly accessible. You don’t even need a proper camera these days. Anyone with a newish cellphone can shoot and put a video up online in no time. However, learning and using the technology is the easy part – just like learning how to use a pen to write – the tricky part is to create something that captivates your audience.

A common mistake non-pros make when creating promo videos is to cram a ton of information into a short period of screen time. Or worse – reciting a laundry list of info in a long video. Web viewers have extremely short attention spans. Studies have shown that people usually just watch mere seconds of web videos, and most people do not finish even a 3 min video. A long video (that’s anything longer than 4 mins in the online world) better has an intriguing hook, otherwise most people would not even want to press play.

The nature of online library promotional videos share a lot of similarities with TV commercials. Both are (and should be) short (usually 30sec – 1 min), both try to “sell” something, and both want the audience to “take action” to buy/use the products. A lot of good TV commercials are good short films, which means that a good script is essential.

The purpose of the promo is to get your audience to use your libraries/products/services. So, 1) we must figure out what we have, what’s unique about us, that would be attractive to our potential users. This is really the first step of any marketing plan. 2) Distill that into one easy to remember message (a slogan). 3) Then craft a memorable and entertaining short story (video) that shows, not tells (that’s the golden rule of screenwriting) the audience our message.  Simple, right? I can’t help you with the first 2 steps, but hopefully I can give you better ideas of how to achieve step 3 by sharing some of what I have learned in screenwriting.

The most memorable commercials tend to deliver one simple message that captures the essence of the product/service/company/person that it promotes. Think Nike’s “Just Do It”, or Apple’s “Think Different”. Now compare them to those local (let’s say, furniture stores or car dealerships) commercials where someone just stands there and “tells” you all the facts and information he can fit into that 30sec – 1 min time slot. Which one creates more impact? Obviously a Nike commercial has a multi-million dollar budget that a local business simply can’t match. But creativity can overcome financial limitations. Many great commercials do not cost a lot of money. They are great because of their clever ideas. And we will see an example of that in the commercial below.

This funny AT&T commercial most likely didn’t cost much to make. There’s no fancy CGI, or spectacular car chases. There is only one office location, and only one speaking actor. We can all do that, right? Yes!

The simple message here is “Don’t get left behind. AT&T – The nation’s fastest mobile network is now getting faster with 4G”. Instead of just “telling” us that, the humorous story is a wonderful way to “show” us the importance of having a fast connection, or rather, the danger of not having one. The story has a proper structure. There is a beginning, middle and end. The beginning (the set up) is the guy (who doesn’t have AT&T) notices that there’s a taco party and he thinks he’s not invited. The middle (the confrontation) is him mouthing off to his co-workers. And the end (the resolution) is him realizing that he’s actually invited but his phone was just too slow *oops*. Then there’s the call to action – “don’t get left behind” – what are you waiting for? Get AT&T now!

Seeing something like this gives us hope that we don’t need millions of dollars to make a good promo video for our libraries. My next post in this series will talk about story structure in more details.

Print Friendly

Week 52

Posted by – January 17, 2011

December 24 – December 31

Films watched: None

Books read: None

Screenplays read:

  1. Please Give – by Nicole Holofcener
  2. Undercover Brother – by John Ridley – 10/24/2000
  3. Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle – by Jon Hurwitz and Hayden Schlossberg – 5/28/2003
  4. The Lookout – by Scott Frank – 12/31/1998
  5. The Social Network – by Aaron Sorkin – 5/28/2009

It was a mad dash at the end, but I’m happy to report that I actually completed my main goal of watching 365 films in 2010! I even read 52 scripts! Although I didn’t reach my goal of reading 24 books that have been adapted into movies (I read 16) nor writing a screenplay (I finished the 1st act), I believe I have definitely accomplished a lot more than I would have if I hadn’t set those goals at all.

Looking back, there were quite a few really amazing films I saw in 2010. Many of them were well-known classics such as Tokyo Story or Umberto D, but there were also many new discoveries for me. David Lynch’s Mulholland Drive was certainly a dreamy cinematic experience. Koreeda’s Still Walking is almost like a modern day Ozu film. My car movies phase introduced me to such classics as Vanishing Point, Le Mans, and Two-Lane Blacktop, and my new food obsession took me to the scrumptious Babette’s Feast.

Scott Frank’s The Lookout was a very pleasant discovery, and so was Starting out in the Evening. I saw some films that I had been wanting to see in years, and many of them turned out to be even better than I expected. George Sluizer’s The Vanishing (the original version) is one of the most chilling films I have ever seen. Swingers is thoroughly enjoyable. And A Simple Plan is a first class thriller that deserves to be in the same league as Fargo.

And some of my least favorite movies? Cannonball Run. Catwoman. Everybody Wants to be Italian.

Pick of the Year:

Mulholland Drive

2010:

Total films watched: 365 (in 365 days)

Total books read:  16 (8 to go)

Total screenplays read: 52 (0 to go)

Print Friendly

Week 51

Posted by – December 25, 2010

December 17 – December 23

Films watched:

  1. Big Fan (2009)
  2. The Chinese Feast (金玉满堂) (1995)
  3. The Tourist (2010)
  4. The Whole Shebang (2001)
  5. I Love You Phillip Morris (2009)
  6. Going the Distance (2010)
  7. Primal Fear (1996)
  8. Frida (2002)
  9. Three O’Clock High (1987)
  10. Lake Placid (1999)
  11. Camilla (1994)
  12. Single White Female (1992)
  13. Bodies, Rest & Motion (1993)
  14. The Road to Wellville (1994)
  15. A Simple Plan (1998)
  16. Scandal (1989)
  17. Mr. Jealousy (1997)
  18. Chances Are (1989)
  19. Black Swan (2010)
  20. Monsters (2010)
  21. Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work (2010)
  22. The Lookout (2007)

Books Read: None

Screenplays Read:

  1. Ocean’s 11 – Screenplay by Ted Griffin – May 31, 2001.
  2. Due Date – Written by Alan R. Cohen and Alan Freedland – March 6, 2009 (Second Draft).
  3. Somewhere – Written by Sofia Coppola.
  4. Easy A – Written by Bert Royal – August 3, 2006.
  5. Chloe - Screenplay by Erin Cressida Wilson – July 31, 2008.
  6. Going the Distance – Written by Geoff LaTulippe.

Pick of the Week:

Black Swan


2010:

Total films watched: 365 (in 357 days)

Total books read:  16 (8 to go)

Total screenplays read: 47 (5 to go)

Print Friendly

Week 50

Posted by – December 16, 2010

Books Read: None

Screenplays Read:

  1. Gran Torino – written by Nick Schenk – May 5, 2008.
  2. Before Sunset – written by Richard Linklater, Julie Delpy, Ethan Hawke - Aug., 25th, 2003.

Pick of the Week:

Agora

2010:

Total films watched: 343 (in 350 days)

Total books read:  16 (8 to go)

Total screenplays read: 41 (11 to go)

Print Friendly

Week 49

Posted by – December 9, 2010

Books Read: None

Screenplays Read:

  1. The Bucket List – written by Justin Zackham – November 29, 2006.
  2. The Kids are All Right – written by Lisa Cholodenko & Stuart Blumberg – August 3, 2009.
  3. The Devil Wears Prada – screenplay by Peter Hedges – March 5, 2005.

Pick of the Week:

Broken Embraces

2010:

Total films watched: 328 (in 343 days)

Total books read: 16 (8 to go)

Total screenplays read: 39 (15 to go)

Print Friendly

Week 46

Posted by – November 28, 2010

November 12 – November 18

Films watched:

  1. Austin Powers in Goldmember (2002)
  2. Go (1999)
  3. The Long Kiss Goodnight (1996)
  4. Waiting (2005)

Books Read: None

Screenplays Read:

  1. Ratatouille – written by Brad Bird.

    Pick of the Week:

    Go


    2010:

    Total films watched:  301 (in 322 days)

    Total books read:  15 (9 to go)

    Total screenplays read: 36 (18 to go)

    Print Friendly